Sensible things are those only which are immediately perceived by sense. Explain Berkeley's theory of knowledge with reference to the above statement.

← all philosophy optional previous year questions

The following answer addresses the question "Sensible things are those only which are immediately perceived by sense. Explain Berkeley's theory of knowledge with reference to the above statement.".

Berkeley's theory of knowledge, as presented in his seminal work "A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge," is a radical empiricist perspective that directly challenges Cartesian dualism and the notion of innate ideas. The statement "Sensible things are those only which are immediately perceived by sense" encapsulates the core of Berkeley's philosophy. By anchoring all knowledge in immediate sensory experience, Berkeley argues that our understanding of the world is fundamentally subjective and that the mind's role is to perceive and interpret these sensations.

Berkeley's primary contention is that there is no such thing as an unperceived substance or matter. In his view, the distinction between primary and secondary qualities is crucial. Primary qualities, such as extension, motion, and shape, are attributes that are perceived directly by the senses. Secondary qualities, on the other hand, are perceived through our sensation of them, but they are not directly perceived as existing in the objects themselves. For instance, the color red is not a primary quality of an object but is a sensation produced by the object's interaction with our senses.

Berkeley's theory of knowledge can be unpacked through several interconnected arguments:

Immanuel Kant's Influence on Berkeley's Theory of Knowledge

Empiricism and Sensation: Berkeley's empiricism asserts that all knowledge is derived from sensation. This contrasts with rationalist philosophy, which posits that some ideas can be known independently of experience. Berkeley maintains that even abstract ideas, such as numbers and universals, are derived from sensory experience. For example, the idea of a circle is constructed from the repeated experience of circular objects, which are perceived through our senses.
Immediacy of Perception: Berkeley's theory emphasizes the immediate perception of sensible things. He argues that we do not perceive objects as existing in a separate, unperceived substance; instead, we perceive the objects themselves directly. When we see a tree, we do not perceive a physical object called "tree" but rather our sensation of the tree. Berkeley's famous dictum, "esse est percipi" (to be is to be perceived), underscores this point. For Berkeley, the existence of objects is dependent on their being perceived.
Idealism: Berkeley's theory leads to a form of idealism, where the existence of objects is dependent on their being perceived. He holds that the mind alone is a real substance, and all other entities are either perceptions or ideas in the mind. Berkeley's famous "tree example" illustrates this: when no one is looking at a tree, it does not exist in the same way that we perceive it when someone is looking at it. This idea challenges the notion of an objective, mind-independent reality.
Causal Relations: Berkeley's theory of knowledge also addresses the nature of causality. He argues that causality is a relationship between ideas in the mind. For instance, when we see a billiard ball move after being struck by another ball, we perceive these events as causally related. However, Berkeley maintains that this causation is a matter of the ideas in our mind being perceived in a certain sequence. There is no unperceived cause in the physical world; instead, our perception of the sequence of events is what constitutes causality.

Critique of Berkeley's Theory

Cartesian Dualism: Berkeley's rejection of Cartesian dualism, which posits a clear distinction between mind and body, has been both praised and criticized. Critics argue that Berkeley's idealism leads to a reduction of reality to mere perception, ignoring the possibility of an objective world independent of the mind.
Skepticism: While Berkeley's theory attempts to address skeptical arguments about the reliability of perception, it opens the door to another form of skepticism. If all knowledge is derived from immediate perception, how do we know that our perceptions are not illusory? Berkeley's response to this objection is to argue that God is the guarantor of the reliability of our perceptions. However, this appeal to divine intervention has been criticized as a form of circular reasoning.
Physical Objects: Berkeley's denial of the existence of unperceived substances raises questions about the nature of physical objects. If we cannot perceive physical objects independently of our senses, how can we account for their persistence through our experience? Berkeley's solution is to argue that God continually perceives the physical world, ensuring its existence between our perceptions. However, this position has been criticized for its reliance on divine intervention and its lack of a coherent explanation of physical objects' persistence.

Comparison with Other Philosophical Theories

René Descartes and Cartesian Dualism: Descartes' philosophy posits a clear distinction between mind and body, with the mind being a thinking substance and the body being an extended substance. Berkeley's rejection of Cartesian dualism and his argument that all substance is mental or idealistic directly challenges Descartes' philosophy. Descartes' notion of innate ideas, which Berkeley rejects, is replaced by Berkeley's emphasis on immediate sensation as the source of all knowledge.
David Hume's Empiricism: While Berkeley and Hume are both empiricists, they differ in their views on abstract ideas and causality. Berkeley argues that all abstract ideas are derived from sensory experience, whereas Hume suggests that abstract ideas are not derived from experience but are formed through the association of similar experiences. Additionally, Hume's skepticism about causality is more radical than Berkeley's, as Hume questions whether we have a direct experience of cause and effect.
Immanuel Kant's Transcendental Idealism: Kant, in his "Critique of Pure Reason," posits that space, time, and causality are not features of the mind-independent world but are conditions of our experience. Kant's transcendental idealism shares some similarities with Berkeley's idealism in recognizing the role of the mind in shaping our experience of the world. However, Kant distinguishes between phenomena (which are subject to our experience) and noumena (which are not), whereas Berkeley holds that only phenomena exist.

Application of Berkeley's Theory in Modern Philosophy

Contemporary Idealism: Berkeley's theory of knowledge has influenced contemporary idealist philosophers, such as George Santayana and Brand Blanshard. These philosophers have built upon Berkeley's ideas to develop more nuanced and comprehensive theories of idealism.
Berkeley's Influence on Phenomenology: Phenomenologists, including Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, have drawn on Berkeley's emphasis on the role of consciousness in shaping our experience of the world. Phenomenology seeks to describe the structure of experience and the meaning of the world as it appears to consciousness, a project that shares similarities with Berkeley's theory.
Berkeley in Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: Berkeley's emphasis on perception and its role in shaping our understanding of the world has influenced contemporary debates in the philosophy of mind. For instance, the debate between direct realism (the view that we perceive physical objects directly) and indirect realism (the view that we perceive representations of physical objects) bears a resemblance to the debate between Berkeley's idealism and materialism.

Conclusion

Berkeley's theory of knowledge, as encapsulated in the statement "Sensible things are those only which are immediately perceived by sense," presents a radical empiricist perspective that challenges dualist and rationalist philosophies. By emphasizing the role of immediate perception in our knowledge of the world, Berkeley argues for an idealistic view where the existence of objects is dependent on their being perceived. While Berkeley's theory has been subject to critique, it has also influenced contemporary philosophy, particularly in the realms of idealism, phenomenology, and the philosophy of mind. Despite its limitations, Berkeley's theory remains a significant contribution to the history of philosophy, offering a powerful argument for the primacy of perception in our understanding of the world.