Critically examine Quine's postulate of empiricism without the dogmas with reference to his "Two Dogmas of Empiricism".

← all philosophy optional previous year questions

The following answer addresses the question "Critically examine Quine's postulate of empiricism without the dogmas with reference to his "Two Dogmas of Empiricism".".

Critically Examining Quine's Postulate of Empiricism without the Dogmas with Reference to His "Two Dogmas of Empiricism"

Willard Van Orman Quine's "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" (1951) is a seminal work in the philosophy of language and epistemology, where he challenges two traditional assumptions of empiricism: the analytic-synthetic distinction and the idea that meaning is a function of reference. Quine's postulate of empiricism without the dogmas suggests that we should abandon these assumptions and adopt a more pragmatic approach to knowledge and meaning. This essay critically examines Quine's postulate, delving into the implications of his arguments and the subsequent debates they have sparked.

The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

Quine's first target is the analytic-synthetic distinction, which posits that statements can be divided into those that are true by virtue of their logical form (analytic) and those that are true or false based on empirical evidence (synthetic). Quine argues that this distinction is not tenable because it is not clear how to draw a sharp line between analytic and synthetic statements. He uses the example of the statement "All bachelors are unmarried" to illustrate his point. While it might seem analytic, Quine argues that it is actually a synthetic statement because it is not true by virtue of its logical form alone but also because it is true by virtue of empirical facts about the world.

Critique of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction: Quine's critique of the analytic-synthetic distinction has been influential but not without criticism. Some philosophers, such as Saul Kripke, have argued that Quine's rejection of the distinction is too hasty. Kripke, in his "Naming and Necessity" (1972), suggests that there is a clear difference between analytic and synthetic statements, and that Quine's examples do not adequately challenge the distinction. However, Quine's point remains that the distinction is not clear enough to be practically useful, and that it is better to abandon it in favor of a more pragmatic approach to meaning.

The Meaning is Use Theory

Quine's second target is the idea that meaning is a function of reference, which he attributes to the logical empiricists. He argues that this view is not tenable because it does not account for the way we use language to communicate and understand the world. Quine introduces the concept of "meaning as use" to emphasize that the meaning of a word is determined by how it is used in a community of speakers.

Critique of the Meaning is Reference Theory: Quine's "meaning as use" theory has been widely influential but has also been subject to criticism. Some philosophers, such as Michael Dummett, have argued that Quine's theory does not adequately account for the role of truth in meaning. Dummett, in his "Truth and Other Enigmas" (1978), suggests that the meaning of a statement is not just a matter of how it is used but also a matter of what it is true or false about. Quine's response to this critique is that truth is not a fundamental concept but rather a derivative one, and that meaning should be understood in terms of use rather than truth.

Empiricism without the Dogmas

Quine's postulate of empiricism without the dogmas suggests that we should abandon the analytic-synthetic distinction and the idea that meaning is a function of reference in favor of a more pragmatic approach to knowledge and meaning. This approach emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and the role of language in shaping our understanding of the world.

Implications of Quine's Postulate: Quine's postulate has significant implications for epistemology and the philosophy of language. It challenges traditional views of knowledge and meaning and opens up new avenues for inquiry. For example, it has led to a more pragmatic approach to science, where theories are evaluated not just on their logical consistency but also on their empirical success. It has also influenced the development of naturalized epistemology, which seeks to understand the cognitive processes that underlie our knowledge of the world.

However, Quine's postulate has also been subject to criticism. Some philosophers, such as Hilary Putnam, have argued that Quine's rejection of the analytic-synthetic distinction and the idea that meaning is a function of reference goes too far and leads to a form of relativism. Putnam, in his "The Meaning of 'Meaning'" (1975), suggests that there are objective facts about the meaning of words and that Quine's pragmatic approach does not adequately account for these facts.

Naturalized Epistemology

Quine's postulate has been a significant influence on the development of naturalized epistemology, which seeks to understand the cognitive processes that underlie our knowledge of the world. This approach emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and the role of language in shaping our understanding of the world.

Critique of Naturalized Epistemology: Naturalized epistemology has been subject to criticism, particularly from those who argue that it reduces knowledge to a matter of belief and that it does not adequately account for the role of reason in knowledge. Some philosophers, such as Alvin Goldman, have argued that naturalized epistemology is too narrow and that it does not adequately capture the complexity of human cognition. However, Quine's influence on naturalized epistemology is undeniable, and his pragmatic approach to knowledge and meaning has been a significant factor in its development.

Conclusion

Quine's postulate of empiricism without the dogmas is a radical challenge to traditional views of knowledge and meaning. His critique of the analytic-synthetic distinction and the idea that meaning is a function of reference has led to a more pragmatic approach to these issues, with significant implications for epistemology and the philosophy of language. While his postulate has been subject to criticism, it remains a powerful and influential idea in contemporary philosophy. Quine's work continues to inspire and challenge philosophers, and his ideas continue to shape the way we think about knowledge and meaning.

References

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism." The Philosophical Review, 60(3), 20-41.
Kripke, S. A. (1972). "Naming and Necessity." In Semantics of Natural Language, 253-355. Harvard University Press.
Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (1975). "The Meaning of 'Meaning'." In Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, 215-271. Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). "Naturalized Epistemology." In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, 1-26. Oxford University Press.