Distinguish between pudgala-nairātmyavāda and dharma-nairātmyavāda with reference to Buddhist Philosophy.
← all philosophy optional previous year questions
The following answer addresses the question "Distinguish between pudgala-nairātmyavāda and dharma-nairātmyavāda with reference to Buddhist Philosophy.".
Buddhist philosophy has grappled with the fundamental question of the nature of the self and its relationship to the external world. Two distinct perspectives have emerged within Buddhist thought, known as Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda and Dharma-Nairātmyavāda. These philosophical positions have significant implications for the understanding of the self, the nature of reality, and the path to liberation.
Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda: The Denial of the Substantial Self
Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda, also known as the "doctrine of the non-existence of a personal self," is a philosophical stance within the Theravada tradition of Buddhism. This view denies the existence of a permanent, substantial self or 'ātman' (the essential core of an individual) as proposed in Hindu philosophy. Instead, it posits the concept of 'pudgala,' which is a functional or empirical self that is constantly changing and devoid of any inherent essence.
The Notion of Anattā (Non-self)
The foundation of Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda is the Buddhist doctrine of Anattā, which asserts that there is no permanent, unchanging self or soul. This doctrine is rooted in the observation that all phenomena, including the individual, are impermanent and subject to constant change. The self is seen as a temporary collection of physical and mental elements, devoid of any underlying essence or substance.
Rejection of the Substantial Self
Pudgala-Nairātmyavādins reject the idea of a permanent, unitary self or 'ātman' as proposed in Hindu philosophy. They argue that the notion of a substantial self is an illusion, a product of our conceptual thinking and attachment to the notion of an enduring self. Instead, they posit the concept of 'pudgala,' which is a functional or empirical self that is constantly changing and lacks any inherent essence.
The Composite Nature of the Self
According to Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda, the self is a composite of various physical and mental elements, such as the body, sensations, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness. These elements are constantly arising and passing away, and the self is seen as a mere label or convenient fiction used to describe this ever-changing process.
The Denial of Permanent Essence
Pudgala-Nairātmyavādins emphasize that the self is not a permanent, unitary entity but rather a dynamic process of constant change and interdependence. They argue that the belief in a substantial self is a source of suffering and ignorance, as it leads to attachment, craving, and the perpetuation of the cycle of rebirth.
Dharma-Nairātmyavāda: The Denial of the Existence of Dharmas
In contrast to Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda, Dharma-Nairātmyavāda is a philosophical position within the Mahayana tradition of Buddhism. This view not only denies the existence of a permanent, substantial self but also challenges the existence of the fundamental building blocks of reality, known as 'dharmas.'
The Notion of Dharmas
In Buddhist philosophy, 'dharmas' are the basic constituents of reality, the smallest units of experience or phenomena. They are the fundamental elements that make up the physical and mental world, such as sensations, perceptions, mental states, and physical objects.
Rejection of the Existence of Dharmas
Dharma-Nairātmyavādins go a step further than Pudgala-Nairātmyavādins by denying the existence of dharmas themselves. They argue that just as the notion of a substantial self is an illusion, the belief in the existence of discrete, independent dharmas is also a conceptual fabrication.
The Emptiness (Śūnyatā) of Dharmas
Dharma-Nairātmyavādins emphasize the concept of Śūnyatā, or the fundamental emptiness of all phenomena. They assert that dharmas, like the self, are devoid of any inherent existence or essence. They are seen as empty, interdependent, and ultimately unreal.
The Interconnectedness of Phenomena
Dharma-Nairātmyavādins view the world as a complex web of interconnected and interdependent phenomena, where the existence of any single dharma is dependent on the existence of all other dharmas. They argue that the belief in the independent existence of dharmas is a manifestation of the fundamental ignorance that perpetuates the cycle of suffering.
The Negation of the Absolute
Dharma-Nairātmyavādins go beyond the denial of the self and the denial of the existence of dharmas. They also negate the existence of any absolute, permanent, or unchanging reality, including the ultimate reality or 'Absolute' (Brahman) proposed in Hindu philosophy. They view the entire phenomenal world as devoid of any intrinsic essence or permanence.
Implications and Significance
The philosophical differences between Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda and Dharma-Nairātmyavāda have significant implications for the understanding of the self, the nature of reality, and the path to liberation.
Implications for the Understanding of the Self
Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda denies the existence of a permanent, substantial self, but it acknowledges the existence of a functional or empirical self (pudgala) that is constantly changing. Dharma-Nairātmyavāda, on the other hand, denies the existence of even this functional self, viewing the self as a conceptual fabrication without any underlying reality.
Implications for the Understanding of Reality
Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda recognizes the existence of dharmas as the fundamental building blocks of reality, while Dharma-Nairātmyavāda denies the existence of dharmas themselves, viewing the entire phenomenal world as empty and devoid of any intrinsic essence.
Implications for the Path to Liberation
Both Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda and Dharma-Nairātmyavāda share the ultimate goal of liberation from suffering and the cycle of rebirth. However, the paths they prescribe differ based on their philosophical perspectives. Pudgala-Nairātmyavādins focus on the realization of the non-self (anattā) and the abandonment of attachment to the notion of a permanent self. Dharma-Nairātmyavādins, on the other hand, emphasize the realization of the emptiness (Śūnyatā) of all phenomena, including the self and the dharmas.
The distinction between Pudgala-Nairātmyavāda and Dharma-Nairātmyavāda reflects the profound philosophical diversity within the Buddhist tradition. While both views share the fundamental goal of liberation from suffering, they differ in their understanding of the self and the nature of reality. These philosophical differences have significant implications for the conceptualization of the self, the interpretation of the Buddhist teachings, and the pursuit of enlightenment.