If everything is momentary then how do the Buddhists explain the problem of memory and personal identity? Critically discuss.

← all philosophy optional previous year questions

The following answer addresses the question "If everything is momentary then how do the Buddhists explain the problem of memory and personal identity? Critically discuss.".

The Buddhist Perspective on Memory and Personal Identity

The Buddhist philosophical tradition has grappled with the question of how the doctrine of momentariness, or the idea that all phenomena are constantly arising and passing away in a continuous flux, can be reconciled with the apparent continuity of memory and personal identity. This is a challenging issue that has been the subject of much debate and discussion within the Buddhist community.

The Doctrine of Momentariness

The Buddhist understanding of reality is based on the principle of anicca, or impermanence. According to this view, all phenomena, including the self, are in a constant state of change and flux, with no permanent or unchanging essence. The Buddha taught that everything is momentary, arising and passing away in a continuous stream of becoming (Rahula, 1959). This doctrine of momentariness, or kshanikatva, is a central tenet of Buddhist metaphysics.

The Problem of Memory and Personal Identity

The issue that arises is how, if everything is momentary, can we have a coherent sense of memory and personal identity. How can we have a continuous sense of self if all phenomena, including the self, are constantly changing? This question has been a longstanding challenge for Buddhist thinkers.

Explanations and Debates within Buddhist Thought

The Theory of Momentary Consciousness: One of the ways in which Buddhists have sought to address this problem is through the theory of momentary consciousness, or citta-kshana. According to this view, the mind is not a unitary, permanent entity, but rather a series of momentary mental events or "thought-moments" (Gethin, 1998). Each thought-moment arises and passes away, but there is a continuity of consciousness that persists through this stream of momentary mental states.
The Concept of Causality: Another key aspect of the Buddhist understanding of reality is the principle of dependent origination, or pratitya-samutpada. This holds that all phenomena arise due to the interplay of various causal factors, and that nothing has an independent, self-sustaining existence (Nagarjuna, 1995). In the context of memory and personal identity, Buddhists argue that the sense of self is not a unitary, permanent entity, but rather a constantly changing process that is dependent on a complex web of causal conditions.
The Role of Karma and Rebirth: Some Buddhists have also sought to explain the apparent continuity of memory and personal identity through the concepts of karma and rebirth. The idea is that our actions in one life shape the conditions of our next life, and that there is a continuity of consciousness that persists across these successive incarnations (Tenzin Gyatso, 1997). In this view, the sense of personal identity is not a fixed, unchanging entity, but rather a stream of consciousness that is shaped by our past actions and reborn in new forms.
The Concept of Non-Self: At the heart of the Buddhist understanding of reality is the doctrine of anatta, or non-self. This holds that there is no permanent, unchanging self or soul, but rather a constantly changing process of physical and mental phenomena (Bhikkhu Bodhi, 2000). In this view, the sense of personal identity is an illusion, a convenient fiction that we construct to make sense of our experience, but which has no ultimate, objective reality.

Critical Perspectives and Challenges

While the Buddhist explanations for the apparent continuity of memory and personal identity have their merits, they are not without their challenges and criticisms.

The Paradox of Momentariness and Continuity: One of the main criticisms of the Buddhist view is that it seems to create a paradox between the doctrine of momentariness and the apparent continuity of experience. If everything is momentary, how can we have a coherent sense of memory and personal identity (Siderits, 2007)?
The Problem of Agency and Responsibility: Another challenge is the question of how, if there is no permanent self, we can be held accountable for our actions and their consequences. If the self is not a fixed, unchanging entity, how can we be said to be the authors of our own deeds (Kalupahana, 1987)?
The Limits of Explanatory Power: Some scholars have also argued that the Buddhist explanations, while philosophically sophisticated, may not fully capture the phenomenological complexity of human experience. The sense of personal identity, they argue, is not simply a convenient fiction, but a deeply felt and meaningful aspect of our lived experience (Parfit, 1984).

Reconciling the Buddhist View with Contemporary Perspectives

Despite these challenges, the Buddhist perspective on memory and personal identity continues to be a subject of ongoing discussion and debate, both within the Buddhist tradition and in the broader philosophical community.

One way in which the Buddhist view can be reconciled with contemporary perspectives is through the recognition that the self is not a unitary, permanent entity, but rather a constantly changing process that is shaped by a complex interplay of physical, mental, and social factors (Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991). In this view, the sense of personal identity is not a fixed, unchanging essence, but rather a dynamic, ever-evolving process that is deeply embedded in the larger web of interdependence and causality that characterizes the Buddhist understanding of reality.

Moreover, the Buddhist emphasis on the non-dual nature of self and other, and the recognition of the fundamental interconnectedness of all phenomena, can be seen as offering valuable insights into the nature of human experience and the limits of individualistic conceptions of the self (Thich Nhat Hanh, 1999). By recognizing the profound interdependence of all things, the Buddhist view can help us to develop a more nuanced and holistic understanding of memory, personal identity, and the human condition.

Conclusion

The Buddhist perspective on memory and personal identity is a complex and multilayered one that continues to be the subject of ongoing debate and discussion. While the doctrine of momentariness presents challenges in reconciling the apparent continuity of experience, the Buddhist thinkers have developed sophisticated philosophical frameworks to address this issue.

Ultimately, the Buddhist view on memory and personal identity invites us to rethink our assumptions about the nature of the self and to cultivate a deeper appreciation for the interconnectedness of all things. By embracing the Buddhist perspective, we may come to a more nuanced and insightful understanding of the human condition, one that recognizes the inherent fluidity and interdependence of our lived experience.

References

Bhikkhu Bodhi. (2000). The connected discourses of the Buddha: A new translation of the Samyutta Nikaya. Wisdom Publications.

Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press.

Kalupahana, D. J. (1987). The principles of Buddhist psychology. State University of New York Press.

Nagarjuna. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika. (J. L. Garfield, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Clarendon Press.

Rahula, W. (1959). What the Buddha taught. Grove Press.

Siderits, M. (2007). Buddhism as philosophy: An introduction. Hackett Publishing.

Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama. (1997). The four noble truths. Thorsons.

Thich Nhat Hanh. (1999). The heart of the Buddha's teaching: Transforming suffering into peace, joy, and liberation. Harmony.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.